header-logo header-logo

11 October 2022
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Consulting on the new Solicitors Indemnity Fund

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has opened its consultation on a post-SIF indemnity scheme.

The SRA Board decided last month that an SRA-run indemnity scheme offered the best protection for post-six-year negligence claims against solicitors. The scheme will run from September 2023, matching the protection provided by the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) where a claim arises more than six years after a firm has closed and there is no successor practice.

All solicitors were insured by SIF until 2000, when the profession turned to the open market for insurance, but there is no cover for post six-year claims.

The SRA consultation, ‘Consumer protection for post six-year negligence’, which runs until 3 January 2023, invites views on draft rules for the scheme.

Welcoming the consultation, Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘We note the SRA is confident they will be able to deliver the same protections as SIF, at a lower cost.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll