header-logo header-logo

17 November 2009
Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Consumer experts appointed to advise on regulation

Individual and business consumers will play a key role in shaping the future regulation of lawyers.

In a first for the legal profession, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has appointed an independent eight-member consumer panel to help shape the regulatory framework of lawyers.

The Consumer Panel, which will be chaired by Dr Dianne Hayter, the former vice-chair of the Financial Services Consumer Panel, will operate independently of the LSB and will work to develop a sharper focus on consumer interests. It will publish its advice. If the LSB chooses to ignore this advice, it will be required to justify its decision in a published written statement.

Hayter, who was appointed to her post in July, said the panel would assess proposals “from the standpoint of users of legal services”.

The establishment of the Panel is a statutory requirement of the Legal Services Act 2007.

The experience of Panel members covers trading standards, housing, business advice, employment law, health care, policing and refugee policy.

Panel appointees include: Carol Brady, a director at the Local Better Regulation Office; Graham Corbett, senior national officer at the Commercial Services Union; Paul Munden, who has held senior board posts at Business Link; and Karin Woodley, the former chief executive of the Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust.

 

Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll