header-logo header-logo

Consumer rights confusion?

02 April 2015
Issue: 7647 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers have raised concerns about the Consumer Rights Act, which passed into law last week.

The Act aims to streamline key consumer rights and remedies when goods are faulty. It also covers unfair contract terms, uncompetitive action by businesses, consumer rights over digital content and refunds for services that do not match up to expectation.

Businesses have until 1 October to implement the Act and educate staff about the changes.

However, Nicky Strong, regulatory lawyer at law firm Bond Dickinson says: “The headlines suggest that the changes are largely a matter of common sense but the devil is in the detail and the main concern around the Act is how the enforcement and remedies sections are going to work in practice.

“Under the new changes, consumers will have the right to a reduction in the price or to reject the goods after only one unsuccessful repair or replacement. This is one part that is causing some significant uncertainty. Businesses are already expressing concerns as to how they should approach customer complaints and what remedies can be used and when.

“It is clear that greater clarity is still required on certain aspects of the Act and how it will operate, and with only six months and a General Election to go, it may be cutting it fine for the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (Bis) to produce guidance which is helpful at a practical level.”

It is understood that Bis will engage more fully with businesses between the election and 1 October, when the Act comes into force.

Issue: 7647 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll