header-logo header-logo

Consumer rights confusion?

02 April 2015
Issue: 7647 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers have raised concerns about the Consumer Rights Act, which passed into law last week.

The Act aims to streamline key consumer rights and remedies when goods are faulty. It also covers unfair contract terms, uncompetitive action by businesses, consumer rights over digital content and refunds for services that do not match up to expectation.

Businesses have until 1 October to implement the Act and educate staff about the changes.

However, Nicky Strong, regulatory lawyer at law firm Bond Dickinson says: “The headlines suggest that the changes are largely a matter of common sense but the devil is in the detail and the main concern around the Act is how the enforcement and remedies sections are going to work in practice.

“Under the new changes, consumers will have the right to a reduction in the price or to reject the goods after only one unsuccessful repair or replacement. This is one part that is causing some significant uncertainty. Businesses are already expressing concerns as to how they should approach customer complaints and what remedies can be used and when.

“It is clear that greater clarity is still required on certain aspects of the Act and how it will operate, and with only six months and a General Election to go, it may be cutting it fine for the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (Bis) to produce guidance which is helpful at a practical level.”

It is understood that Bis will engage more fully with businesses between the election and 1 October, when the Act comes into force.

Issue: 7647 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll