header-logo header-logo

02 April 2015
Issue: 7647 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Consumer rights confusion?

Lawyers have raised concerns about the Consumer Rights Act, which passed into law last week.

The Act aims to streamline key consumer rights and remedies when goods are faulty. It also covers unfair contract terms, uncompetitive action by businesses, consumer rights over digital content and refunds for services that do not match up to expectation.

Businesses have until 1 October to implement the Act and educate staff about the changes.

However, Nicky Strong, regulatory lawyer at law firm Bond Dickinson says: “The headlines suggest that the changes are largely a matter of common sense but the devil is in the detail and the main concern around the Act is how the enforcement and remedies sections are going to work in practice.

“Under the new changes, consumers will have the right to a reduction in the price or to reject the goods after only one unsuccessful repair or replacement. This is one part that is causing some significant uncertainty. Businesses are already expressing concerns as to how they should approach customer complaints and what remedies can be used and when.

“It is clear that greater clarity is still required on certain aspects of the Act and how it will operate, and with only six months and a General Election to go, it may be cutting it fine for the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (Bis) to produce guidance which is helpful at a practical level.”

It is understood that Bis will engage more fully with businesses between the election and 1 October, when the Act comes into force.

Issue: 7647 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll