header-logo header-logo

Contempt laws face overhaul

10 July 2024
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Three forms of contempt of court would be created under reforms proposed by the Law Commission

The commission would end the distinction between ‘criminal contempt’ and ‘civil contempt’. Instead, it would introduce ‘general contempt’, such as abusing court staff or witnesses, disrupting a hearing or making unauthorised recordings of proceedings. Either the court itself or the Attorney General could commence proceedings.

‘Contempt by breach of court order or undertaking’ would cover, for example, protesters entering land in breach of an injunction, a breach by someone subject to an anti-social behaviour injunction, or where a litigant in a high-value dispute takes assets out of the country in breach of a ‘freezing order’. Proceedings could be commenced with permission of the court by the landowner, local authority or litigant who obtained the freezing order.

The third contempt would be ‘contempt by publication when proceedings are active’, such as media reports or social media posts that reveal inadmissible evidence or risk influencing a jury. Proceedings could be commenced only by or with the permission of the Attorney General.

Currently, contempt is punishable by up to two years in prison and unlimited fines. The commission proposes retaining the maximum two-year sentence but expanding the range of sanctions available to include community sentences, restrictions on movement, and drug or alcohol treatment.

Professor Penney Lewis, commissioner for criminal law, said: ‘It is important that the laws governing contempt are both fair and clear to provide justice for all those involved in court proceedings. This includes not only the parties involved, but those observing or reporting on proceedings.’

The consultation, ‘Contempt of court’, published this week, closes on 8 November.

Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll