header-logo header-logo

21 July 2016
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Contingent legal aid fund working group set up

A cross-profession working group has been set up to assess the viability of a contingent legal aid fund (CLAF) to fund litigation for those who can’t access legal aid.

A CLAF is a recyclable, pooled fund which funds litigation and then recoups a portion of any damages recovered to use for future cases. The group will make recommendations by the end of the year.

The group will be chaired by Justin Fenwick QC and will investigate what changes would be needed to make a CLAF viable, including legislative changes and changes to the Civil Procedure Rules, and what initial funding would be required.

Chairman of the Bar, Chantal-Aimee Doerries QC says the Bar Council has published reports into the possibility of a CLAF as far back as 1998 and as recently as 2011, but since then the civil justice landscape has changed considerably.

Issue: 7708 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll