header-logo header-logo

Contingent legal aid fund working group set up

21 July 2016
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A cross-profession working group has been set up to assess the viability of a contingent legal aid fund (CLAF) to fund litigation for those who can’t access legal aid.

A CLAF is a recyclable, pooled fund which funds litigation and then recoups a portion of any damages recovered to use for future cases. The group will make recommendations by the end of the year.

The group will be chaired by Justin Fenwick QC and will investigate what changes would be needed to make a CLAF viable, including legislative changes and changes to the Civil Procedure Rules, and what initial funding would be required.

Chairman of the Bar, Chantal-Aimee Doerries QC says the Bar Council has published reports into the possibility of a CLAF as far back as 1998 and as recently as 2011, but since then the civil justice landscape has changed considerably.

Issue: 7708 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll