header-logo header-logo

01 February 2013 / Kathryn Cearns
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A continuing storm

Will government proposals for shareholder votes on directors’ pay be effective. Kathryn Cearns reports

As the financial crisis segues into a longer term recession and sovereign debt issue, the corporate world continues to suffer an onslaught of criticism over the pay of directors of public companies. What started as specific complaints over bank executive pay has moved into broader attacks on rewards at the top of the wider corporate community. The government has proposed further legislation in this area (through amendments to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill), to facilitate the engagement of investors with the issue, but what will it achieve? Indeed, there is a question which seems further than ever from being answered: what is the appropriate level of executive pay?

The current situation

Since 2002, UK quoted companies (as defined by the Companies Act 2006, s 385) have been obliged to give an advisory vote to their shareholders on their directors’ remuneration report (DRR). This gives a means for shareholders to express their views on the overall approach to director

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll