header-logo header-logo

Contractor claims surge

15 January 2009
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Construction

The credit squeeze is being blamed for a rise in construction claims.

In the third quarter of 2008 there were 32 construction cases filed- a 10% increase on the same quarter in 2007.

Many disputes have arisen between contractors and developers, as both parties have felt the effects of the economic slowdown.

Stuart Nash, a partner in McGrigor's construction department, says the relationship between the parties has changed.

"When a developer tells a contractor that they will not pay the full bill for work as they feel the contract has not been properly fulfilled the tendency has been for the contractor to accept that through gritted teeth. They reasoned that there was no point in getting into an acrimonious court dispute with a client that should be their future source of work. The credit crunch has changed all that.

"With the slowdown in the construction sector contractors worry that there might not be a 'next project' from that client so they have less of a motivation to make concessions over their bill. The contractors figure that if there isn't going to be any guarantee of repeat business why shouldn't they try to force their client to pay in full?"

Nash also believes that it will be the firms which are suffering financially which will face the most claims. "If you suspect that your client isn't going to be aroudn for ever you are going to be eager to pursue them as soon as possible" he adds.

Issue: 7352 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll