header-logo header-logo

26 June 2024
Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing , Profession
printer mail-detail

Conveyancing: crunch vote over TA6 revisions

A vote of no confidence in the Law Society’s ability to represent members who undertake conveyancing will go ahead next month

The crunch vote follows a row over revisions to the TA6 form. The Law Society says the update is a ‘pragmatic response’ to the National Trading Standards Estate and Letting Agency Team’s guidance on material information (MI).

However, the Property Lawyers Action Group says the guidance is not legally binding on estate agents, while MI could mean flawed information is included, putting solicitors and vendors at risk of complex litigation or of committing a criminal offence.

The Law Society has tabled a special general meeting for 23 July, at 2pm in Chancery Lane, or online. Register to attend by 9am on 15 July.

Law Society chief executive officer Ian Jeffery said: ‘We will listen to and carefully consider the views of our members, expressed at the meeting and more widely.’

Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll