header-logo header-logo

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Cookie consent required

Companies and individuals who use cookies without asking first could be fined up to £500,000 under a new law.

Cookies are information files stored on the computer of a person visiting a website, and can be used to identify repeat visitors. Previously, operators of websites using cookies were required to tell browsers how the cookie was being used and how they could opt-out if they objected. However, recent changes to the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 mean cookies can only be placed on machines where the user has given consent. An exception may be made where the cookie is “strictly necessary” for a service requested by the user.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), which has issued guidance on the change, has powers to issue fines of up to £500,000 for breaches of the new law.

Tom Morrison, partner at Rollits, says: “The law has now changed and the ICO will undoubtedly start receiving complaints about websites straight away. 

“It is not in a position to simply ignore those complaints. While it has been widely publicised that the ICO will not will be issuing fines specifically for cookie breaches until May 2012, it has been less widely reported that there is an enforcement mechanism in place effective immediately centred around the use of warning notices.

“If you receive a warning notice before May 2012 and a complaint is received after that date you will be at a significantly heightened risk of receiving a fine.”

Issue: 7469 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll