header-logo header-logo

Cookie consent required

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Companies and individuals who use cookies without asking first could be fined up to £500,000 under a new law.

Cookies are information files stored on the computer of a person visiting a website, and can be used to identify repeat visitors. Previously, operators of websites using cookies were required to tell browsers how the cookie was being used and how they could opt-out if they objected. However, recent changes to the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 mean cookies can only be placed on machines where the user has given consent. An exception may be made where the cookie is “strictly necessary” for a service requested by the user.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), which has issued guidance on the change, has powers to issue fines of up to £500,000 for breaches of the new law.

Tom Morrison, partner at Rollits, says: “The law has now changed and the ICO will undoubtedly start receiving complaints about websites straight away. 

“It is not in a position to simply ignore those complaints. While it has been widely publicised that the ICO will not will be issuing fines specifically for cookie breaches until May 2012, it has been less widely reported that there is an enforcement mechanism in place effective immediately centred around the use of warning notices.

“If you receive a warning notice before May 2012 and a complaint is received after that date you will be at a significantly heightened risk of receiving a fine.”

Issue: 7469 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll