header-logo header-logo

Cookie consent required

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Companies and individuals who use cookies without asking first could be fined up to £500,000 under a new law.

Cookies are information files stored on the computer of a person visiting a website, and can be used to identify repeat visitors. Previously, operators of websites using cookies were required to tell browsers how the cookie was being used and how they could opt-out if they objected. However, recent changes to the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 mean cookies can only be placed on machines where the user has given consent. An exception may be made where the cookie is “strictly necessary” for a service requested by the user.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), which has issued guidance on the change, has powers to issue fines of up to £500,000 for breaches of the new law.

Tom Morrison, partner at Rollits, says: “The law has now changed and the ICO will undoubtedly start receiving complaints about websites straight away. 

“It is not in a position to simply ignore those complaints. While it has been widely publicised that the ICO will not will be issuing fines specifically for cookie breaches until May 2012, it has been less widely reported that there is an enforcement mechanism in place effective immediately centred around the use of warning notices.

“If you receive a warning notice before May 2012 and a complaint is received after that date you will be at a significantly heightened risk of receiving a fine.”

Issue: 7469 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll