header-logo header-logo

CORONERS

23 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (Paul) v Deputy Coroner of the Queen’s Household and Assistant Deputy Coroner for Surrey [2007] EWHC 408 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 31 (Mar)

Under the Coroners Act 1988, s 8(3), a coroner is obliged to conduct an inquest with a jury if there is reason to suspect that the death occurred in circumstances, the continuance or possible  recurrence of which is prejudicial to the health or safety of the public or any section of the public.

HELD For this provision to apply:

(i) the circumstances need not cause the death;
(ii) the prospect of recurrence required for the section to apply is low—the possibility of recurrence, not any higher chance; and
(iii) only a section of the public needs to be at risk from recurrence.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll