header-logo header-logo

CORONERS

23 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (Paul) v Deputy Coroner of the Queen’s Household and Assistant Deputy Coroner for Surrey [2007] EWHC 408 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 31 (Mar)

Under the Coroners Act 1988, s 8(3), a coroner is obliged to conduct an inquest with a jury if there is reason to suspect that the death occurred in circumstances, the continuance or possible  recurrence of which is prejudicial to the health or safety of the public or any section of the public.

HELD For this provision to apply:

(i) the circumstances need not cause the death;
(ii) the prospect of recurrence required for the section to apply is low—the possibility of recurrence, not any higher chance; and
(iii) only a section of the public needs to be at risk from recurrence.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
Peter Kandler’s honorary KC marks long-overdue recognition of a man who helped prise open a closed legal world. In NLJ this week, Roger Smith, columnist and former director of JUSTICE, traces how Kandler founded the UK’s first law centre in 1970, challenging a profession that was largely seen as 'fixers for the rich and apologists for criminals'
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
back-to-top-scroll