header-logo header-logo

Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (Commencement No 7) Order 2011 (SI 2011/1452)

14 July 2011
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Brings into force on 27 June 2011 certain provisions of the Coronersand Justice Act 2009, which:

- amend provisions in the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999in relation to special measures for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses;

- extend automatic eligibility for special measures to witnesses under the age of 18 (as opposed to 17);

- extend automatic eligibility for special measures to witnesses of certain gun and knife crimes listed in the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, Sch 1A;

- make provision to allow child witnesses to opt-out of the primary rule in the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, s 21, which concerns the giving of evidence in chief by video recorded statement and further evidence by live link;

- make special provision for complainants of sexual offences tried in the Crown Court;

- provide for the presence of a supporter when a witness is giving evidence by live link;

- relax the restrictions on a witness giving additional evidence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll