header-logo header-logo

Corporate environmental crime: holding oil companies to account

01 March 2024 / Angus Nurse
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Features , International , Environment , Collective action , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail
161583
Angus Nurse sets out the legal routes for remedying corporate environmental harm
  • Refers to the Bille and Ogale group litigation, and other cases relating to Shell’s activities in the Niger Delta.
  • Due to the challenges of litigation in Global South countries, action targeted at Global North corporate headquarters is emerging as an alternative tactic.
  • Our notion of environmental harm needs to move beyond thinking solely of actual crimes and should consider human rights abuses, expanding our ideas of how a duty of care should be applied and considering the harm caused to present and future generations.
  • Class actions and group litigation that show how thousands of people may be affected by corporate environmental harms may be more meaningful than criminal prosecution.

While many corporations embrace the concepts of social and environmental responsibility, some claim to do so while at the same time causing considerable environmental damage.

The activities of multinational oil companies in sub-Saharan Africa have been damaging both for the environment and for those communities directly and indirectly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll