header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024 / Angus Nurse
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Features , International , Environment , Collective action , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail

Corporate environmental crime: holding oil companies to account

161583
Angus Nurse sets out the legal routes for remedying corporate environmental harm
  • Refers to the Bille and Ogale group litigation, and other cases relating to Shell’s activities in the Niger Delta.
  • Due to the challenges of litigation in Global South countries, action targeted at Global North corporate headquarters is emerging as an alternative tactic.
  • Our notion of environmental harm needs to move beyond thinking solely of actual crimes and should consider human rights abuses, expanding our ideas of how a duty of care should be applied and considering the harm caused to present and future generations.
  • Class actions and group litigation that show how thousands of people may be affected by corporate environmental harms may be more meaningful than criminal prosecution.

While many corporations embrace the concepts of social and environmental responsibility, some claim to do so while at the same time causing considerable environmental damage.

The activities of multinational oil companies in sub-Saharan Africa have been damaging both for the environment and for those communities directly and indirectly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll