header-logo header-logo

Corporate or criminal?

20 January 2011 / Steve Tombs , David Whyte
Issue: 7449 / Categories: Features , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Steve Tombs & David Whyte highlight the dangers of reducing corporate prosecutions

Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts—the title of a recent (August 2010) Law Commission Consultation Document—might prompt the same response as Gandhi had when he heard the phrase “western democracy”.
Any longstanding critics of the consistent failure of law to hold corporations to account for their criminal conduct would have had any hopes of progressive reform dashed early on in its reading, where its organising assumption is stated baldly: “In regulated fields, reliance on the criminal law as the main means of deterring and punishing unwanted behaviour may prove to be an expensive, uncertain and ineffective strategy” (para 1.8). From here then flow a series of proposals which, in our view, will only further undermine the prospects for reversing the decriminalisation of illegal corporate conduct.

Evidence? What evidence?

The assumption encapsulated in the above quotation is by no means an unfamiliar one—and it is one which has gathered momentum in the UK in recent years. Such a claim is, for example, in close

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll