header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021 / Sophia Purkis , Judith Davidge
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Features , National security , Commercial , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Corporate transactions under scrutiny

42834
A new regime for examining business transactions from a national security standpoint is on the way: Sophia Purkis & Judith Davidge provide an overview
  • The National Security and Investment Bill 2019-2021 includes a new regulatory regime to further scrutinise corporate transactions.
  • The Bill’s provisions are intended to protect national security while facilitating global investment in the UK market.

The much-anticipated National Security and Investment Bill 2019-2021 was introduced in the House of Commons on 11 November 2020 and is expected to come into force before the summer, although its provisions came into effect from 12 November 2020.

The Bill aims to introduce a new regime for reviewing and intervening in business transactions (eg takeovers) that might raise national security concerns. It has four main aims, to:

  • enable the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) to ‘call in’ acquisitions of sensitive entitles and assets (‘trigger events’) to understand a national security assessment. This can happen up to five years after a trigger event has occurred;
  • require
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll