header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021 / Sophia Purkis , Judith Davidge
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Features , National security , Commercial , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Corporate transactions under scrutiny

42834
A new regime for examining business transactions from a national security standpoint is on the way: Sophia Purkis & Judith Davidge provide an overview
  • The National Security and Investment Bill 2019-2021 includes a new regulatory regime to further scrutinise corporate transactions.
  • The Bill’s provisions are intended to protect national security while facilitating global investment in the UK market.

The much-anticipated National Security and Investment Bill 2019-2021 was introduced in the House of Commons on 11 November 2020 and is expected to come into force before the summer, although its provisions came into effect from 12 November 2020.

The Bill aims to introduce a new regime for reviewing and intervening in business transactions (eg takeovers) that might raise national security concerns. It has four main aims, to:

  • enable the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) to ‘call in’ acquisitions of sensitive entitles and assets (‘trigger events’) to understand a national security assessment. This can happen up to five years after a trigger event has occurred;
  • require
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll