header-logo header-logo

Corporate transactions under scrutiny

17 March 2021 / Sophia Purkis , Judith Davidge
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Features , National security , Commercial , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
42834
A new regime for examining business transactions from a national security standpoint is on the way: Sophia Purkis & Judith Davidge provide an overview
  • The National Security and Investment Bill 2019-2021 includes a new regulatory regime to further scrutinise corporate transactions.
  • The Bill’s provisions are intended to protect national security while facilitating global investment in the UK market.

The much-anticipated National Security and Investment Bill 2019-2021 was introduced in the House of Commons on 11 November 2020 and is expected to come into force before the summer, although its provisions came into effect from 12 November 2020.

The Bill aims to introduce a new regime for reviewing and intervening in business transactions (eg takeovers) that might raise national security concerns. It has four main aims, to:

  • enable the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) to ‘call in’ acquisitions of sensitive entitles and assets (‘trigger events’) to understand a national security assessment. This can happen up to five years after a trigger event has occurred;
  • require
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll