header-logo header-logo

Corporate transactions under scrutiny

17 March 2021 / Sophia Purkis , Judith Davidge
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Features , National security , Commercial , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
42834
A new regime for examining business transactions from a national security standpoint is on the way: Sophia Purkis & Judith Davidge provide an overview
  • The National Security and Investment Bill 2019-2021 includes a new regulatory regime to further scrutinise corporate transactions.
  • The Bill’s provisions are intended to protect national security while facilitating global investment in the UK market.

The much-anticipated National Security and Investment Bill 2019-2021 was introduced in the House of Commons on 11 November 2020 and is expected to come into force before the summer, although its provisions came into effect from 12 November 2020.

The Bill aims to introduce a new regime for reviewing and intervening in business transactions (eg takeovers) that might raise national security concerns. It has four main aims, to:

  • enable the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) to ‘call in’ acquisitions of sensitive entitles and assets (‘trigger events’) to understand a national security assessment. This can happen up to five years after a trigger event has occurred;
  • require
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll