header-logo header-logo

Corroboration matters in expert assessments

20 September 2024 / Dr Tanya Garrett
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , National Health Service , Health
printer mail-detail
189718
Medical & other information is vital for experts carrying out assessments. Dr Tanya Garrett explains why—& why obtaining it isn’t always easy
  • Medical records and other corroborative information are essential for substantive psychological and some other expert assessments. This is to control for bias and to avoid over-reliance on the client’s account of the client.
  • This article gives guidance on how to access this material, and how to treat it.

Medical records are vital for experts such as psychologists and psychiatrists in all legal proceedings. A good psychological report will include so-called corroborative information. This is information from independent sources that complements the client’s account, filling in any gaps in their memory, whether trauma-induced or age-related. The client may have been too young to remember certain events from their past or may have ‘forgotten’ them due to trauma.

This really does happen—research shows that people who have experienced significant trauma often cope with adverse experiences by ‘forgetting’ some of them. This information will also help the expert

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll