header-logo header-logo

20 September 2024 / Dr Tanya Garrett
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , National Health Service , Health
printer mail-detail

Corroboration matters in expert assessments

189718
Medical & other information is vital for experts carrying out assessments. Dr Tanya Garrett explains why—& why obtaining it isn’t always easy
  • Medical records and other corroborative information are essential for substantive psychological and some other expert assessments. This is to control for bias and to avoid over-reliance on the client’s account of the client.
  • This article gives guidance on how to access this material, and how to treat it.

Medical records are vital for experts such as psychologists and psychiatrists in all legal proceedings. A good psychological report will include so-called corroborative information. This is information from independent sources that complements the client’s account, filling in any gaps in their memory, whether trauma-induced or age-related. The client may have been too young to remember certain events from their past or may have ‘forgotten’ them due to trauma.

This really does happen—research shows that people who have experienced significant trauma often cope with adverse experiences by ‘forgetting’ some of them. This information will also help the expert

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll