header-logo header-logo

Corruption in the courts

07 August 2013
Issue: 7572 / Categories: bribery , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Survey shows one quarter of people in UK do not trust judiciary

“Astonishing” claims have been made of corruption in the UK courts.

One in five people using the courts last year said they or a household member paid a bribe in relation to that, and nearly one quarter of people in the UK believe the courts and judiciary are corrupt, according to anti-corruption group Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer 2013

The survey was conducted among 1,000 people in each of 107 countries.

Dr Lawrence McNamara, deputy director of the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law, writing in this week’s NLJ, said the levels of public perception of corruption were “not out of kilter” with other common law countries, and could be explained by recent scandals in Parliament, the BBC and other institutions.

Among the respondents, 75 people had used the courts, of which 15 people reported paying a bribe, he said. Five of these people said the bribe was a thank you gift. Therefore, 10 people paid a bribe to a judge, court employee or lawyer for a cheaper or faster service.

That would translate to 13% of 3.78 million people using the civil and criminal courts and judiciary last year, or 490,000 people paying bribes, which would be “astonishing”, he said. Evidence of this is “scant”, however, which suggests it is “extremely unlikely”. 

McNamara said the “remarkable” findings did not mean bribery was commonplace in British courtrooms, but should not be ignored. “It should lead us towards robust monitoring and research which examines rigorously and in depth the possibility that corruption may occur in the administration of justice, as it does in other institutions.”

In 2009, CPS barrister Sarfraz Ibrahim was convicted of accepting a share of a £20,000 bribe to drop a case. The first successful prosecution under the Bribery Act 2010 was against Munir Patel, a clerk at Redbridge Crown Court. Research among the legal profession has also indicated corruption is an issue in the UK justice system.

Issue: 7572 / Categories: bribery , Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll