header-logo header-logo

07 August 2013
Issue: 7572 / Categories: bribery , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Corruption in the courts

Survey shows one quarter of people in UK do not trust judiciary

“Astonishing” claims have been made of corruption in the UK courts.

One in five people using the courts last year said they or a household member paid a bribe in relation to that, and nearly one quarter of people in the UK believe the courts and judiciary are corrupt, according to anti-corruption group Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer 2013

The survey was conducted among 1,000 people in each of 107 countries.

Dr Lawrence McNamara, deputy director of the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law, writing in this week’s NLJ, said the levels of public perception of corruption were “not out of kilter” with other common law countries, and could be explained by recent scandals in Parliament, the BBC and other institutions.

Among the respondents, 75 people had used the courts, of which 15 people reported paying a bribe, he said. Five of these people said the bribe was a thank you gift. Therefore, 10 people paid a bribe to a judge, court employee or lawyer for a cheaper or faster service.

That would translate to 13% of 3.78 million people using the civil and criminal courts and judiciary last year, or 490,000 people paying bribes, which would be “astonishing”, he said. Evidence of this is “scant”, however, which suggests it is “extremely unlikely”. 

McNamara said the “remarkable” findings did not mean bribery was commonplace in British courtrooms, but should not be ignored. “It should lead us towards robust monitoring and research which examines rigorously and in depth the possibility that corruption may occur in the administration of justice, as it does in other institutions.”

In 2009, CPS barrister Sarfraz Ibrahim was convicted of accepting a share of a £20,000 bribe to drop a case. The first successful prosecution under the Bribery Act 2010 was against Munir Patel, a clerk at Redbridge Crown Court. Research among the legal profession has also indicated corruption is an issue in the UK justice system.

Issue: 7572 / Categories: bribery , Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll