07 August 2013 / Lawrence McNamara

Issue: 7572 / Categories: Opinion , Bribery , Profession

printer

mail-detail

A sign of the times...or an aberration?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Lawrence McNamara & Celia Rooney on corruption in the UK justice system

Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer reported this month that 24% of people in the UK believe the courts and judiciary are corrupt or extremely corrupt, and that 20% of people who used the courts in 2012 said they or a household member had paid a bribe in relation to that.

These findings have had little attention. They even went unmentioned by the co-chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Anti-Corruption.
Yet, they seem remarkable. Can they really be correct? What are we to make of them?

Temperature gauge

The Barometer is derived from surveys of 1,000 people in each of 107 countries about their perception and experience of corruption in a dozen institutional categories including “Judiciary (courts)”.

First, perception. While 24% think the courts and judiciary are affected by corruption, this is not out of kilter with common law countries such as Australia (28%), Canada (25%), or New Zealand (20%). Still, it is up from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

A sign of the times...or an aberration?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Lawrence McNamara & Celia Rooney on corruption in the UK justice system

Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer reported this month that 24% of people in the UK believe the courts and judiciary are corrupt or extremely corrupt, and that 20% of people who used the courts in 2012 said they or a household member had paid a bribe in relation to that.

These findings have had little attention. They even went unmentioned by the co-chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Anti-Corruption.
Yet, they seem remarkable. Can they really be correct? What are we to make of them?

Temperature gauge

The Barometer is derived from surveys of 1,000 people in each of 107 countries about their perception and experience of corruption in a dozen institutional categories including “Judiciary (courts)”.

First, perception. While 24% think the courts and judiciary are affected by corruption, this is not out of kilter with common law countries such as Australia (28%), Canada (25%), or New Zealand (20%). Still, it is up from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Jasmine Olomolaiye, Foot Anstey

Jasmine Olomolaiye, partner at national law firm Foot Anstey, discusses the power of reading and the dizzying heights of her dream career

Freeths—Christopher Stephens

Freeths—Christopher Stephens

Strategic land specialist joins real estate practice as partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Pawlowski

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Pawlowski

Construction practice strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS

NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders

Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners

NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do

A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent

NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed

Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’

NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits

A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’

NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts

Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients

back-to-top-scroll