header-logo header-logo

22 September 2011
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , CPR
printer mail-detail

COSTLY REALLOCATIONS

The claimant sues for £40,000 but after the defendant has done a considerable amount of work, the claimant reduces his claim...

The claimant sues for £40,000 but after the defendant has done a considerable amount of work, the claimant reduces his claim to £5,000 and what had been a multi-track claim is reallocated to the small claims track. Can the court under any circumstances award the defendant his costs incurred prior to reallocation? No pre-reallocation orders for costs have been made.

The defendant can seek an order under CPR 44.9(2) (which provides that the costs regime for a particular track is to apply to the period before as well as after allocation except where the court or a Practice Direction says otherwise) that multi-track costs should apply up to reallocation. Ideally, the defendant should do so at the case management conference at which the reallocation has been directed.

If reallocation was directed by an own motion order, he should so within seven days of its service. Failure to act promptly could cause the defendant problems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll