header-logo header-logo

22 September 2011
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , CPR
printer mail-detail

COSTLY REALLOCATIONS

The claimant sues for £40,000 but after the defendant has done a considerable amount of work, the claimant reduces his claim...

The claimant sues for £40,000 but after the defendant has done a considerable amount of work, the claimant reduces his claim to £5,000 and what had been a multi-track claim is reallocated to the small claims track. Can the court under any circumstances award the defendant his costs incurred prior to reallocation? No pre-reallocation orders for costs have been made.

The defendant can seek an order under CPR 44.9(2) (which provides that the costs regime for a particular track is to apply to the period before as well as after allocation except where the court or a Practice Direction says otherwise) that multi-track costs should apply up to reallocation. Ideally, the defendant should do so at the case management conference at which the reallocation has been directed.

If reallocation was directed by an own motion order, he should so within seven days of its service. Failure to act promptly could cause the defendant problems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll