header-logo header-logo

18 October 2013
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Michael and another v Middleton and another [2013] All ER (D) 124 (Oct)

The new CPR 3.9 was in force from 1 April 2013. The new rule required that the court considered all the circumstances of the case so as to enable it to deal justly with the application, including the need (a) for litigation to be conducted efficiently and at proportionate cost and (b) to enforce compliance with the Rules, Practice Directions and orders of the court. The new rule applied in respect of any application made on or after 1 April 2013, which was the date on which the amended rule came into force which applied in its opening words “on any application for relief from any sanction imposed”. In a case of non-compliance with an unless order a party would be required to show a material change of circumstances in order to obtain relief from sanctions. Although the checklist of relevant considerations in the old rule 3.9 had been removed, they nonetheless represented matters which continued to be relevant as considerations for the court in making

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carter-Ruck—Tomas Vail

Carter-Ruck—Tomas Vail

Carter-Ruck strengthens International team with appointment of arbitration partner Tomas Vail

Slater Heelis—Nick Terry

Slater Heelis—Nick Terry

Slater Heelis strengthens crime and regulatory team with appointment of Nick Terry as partner

Payne Hicks Beach—Thomas Moran & Sarah Gogan

Payne Hicks Beach—Thomas Moran & Sarah Gogan

Payne Hicks Beach strengthens private wealth offering with appointment of two new partners

NEWS
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
A formidable reputation cannot protect a law firm when partner departures, fragile finances and client uncertainty begin feeding each other
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
back-to-top-scroll