header-logo header-logo

13 December 2013
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Rayner v Lord Chancellor [2013] All ER (D) 26 (Dec)

The first defendant had been the successful party to proceedings brought by a claimant who had been funded by the Legal Services Commission (LSC). The first defendant claimed to be entitled to be indemnified in accordance with the Community Legal Service (Cost Protection) Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/824) for the costs of defending the claim. During the course of the trial, the claimant had ceased to be in receipt of funding, with the result that the first defendant’s, potential claim against the LSC was restricted to the costs incurred by him which were attributable to the part of the proceedings in which the party was funded. The first defendant appealed.

The court ruled that the natural meaning of attributable in para 5(4) of the regulations was that it denoted a simple link between the services funded by the LSC and the defence costs of the non-funded party. That construction accorded with the purpose of the provisions, which was to protect the non-funded party from the consequences of unsuccessful proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll