header-logo header-logo

Costs

13 December 2013
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Rayner v Lord Chancellor [2013] All ER (D) 26 (Dec)

The first defendant had been the successful party to proceedings brought by a claimant who had been funded by the Legal Services Commission (LSC). The first defendant claimed to be entitled to be indemnified in accordance with the Community Legal Service (Cost Protection) Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/824) for the costs of defending the claim. During the course of the trial, the claimant had ceased to be in receipt of funding, with the result that the first defendant’s, potential claim against the LSC was restricted to the costs incurred by him which were attributable to the part of the proceedings in which the party was funded. The first defendant appealed.

The court ruled that the natural meaning of attributable in para 5(4) of the regulations was that it denoted a simple link between the services funded by the LSC and the defence costs of the non-funded party. That construction accorded with the purpose of the provisions, which was to protect the non-funded party from the consequences of unsuccessful proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll