header-logo header-logo

29 April 2016
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

8 Representative Claimants and others v MGN Ltd [2016] EWHC 855 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 127 (Apr)

The Chancery Division held that the legislative regime which permitted the recovery of an uplift under a conditional fee agreement and after the event insurance was not incompatible with Art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. With respect to the CFA uplift, the laws of precedent required the House of Lords’ decision in Campbell v MGN Ltd (No 2) [2005] 4 All ER 793 to be followed and ATE premiums were not treated differently.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
back-to-top-scroll