header-logo header-logo

24 February 2011
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Rolf v De Guerin [2011] EWCA Civ 78, [2011] All ER (D) 169 (Feb)

The mechanism under CPR Pt 36 provided a formal, regulated procedure for a party, including a claimant, to express a willingness to accept something less than total success in his open position in the litigation.

If the offer was not accepted and the offeror did better in the final result than his offer, he was entitled, unless the court considered it would be unjust, to costs on an indemnity basis from the expiry of the “relevant period” (namely three weeks, unless the offer extended it) plus interest at an enhanced rate up to 10% above base rate. Further, the conduct referred to in CPR 44(4) could include the reasonableness of a party’s response to a call for mediation.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll