header-logo header-logo

23 July 2015 / Hannah Rawlins
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs , ADR
printer mail-detail

Costs + ADR = CADR

Hannah Rawlins introduces CADR—a welcome alternative to detailed assessment

Changes to the CPR and rising court fees have resulted in a growing need for alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Aside from the general expense and CPR challenges it is a common frustration that significant delays are experienced in engaging in the formal detailed assessment process. In that period paying parties are left with the uncertainty of not knowing what their actual exposure will be and receiving parties are left out of pocket. Meanwhile interest continues to accrue on outstanding costs in the absence of exactly judged payments on account. No surprise then that ADR has become a sophisticated offering in both the domestic and international legal markets and is now being replicated in the litigious costs industry.

CADR

CADR (Costs Alternative Dispute Resolution) has formed an alternative dispute resolution panel bringing together a number of costs luminaries and experts at every level. Panel members include two recently retired members of the costs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll