header-logo header-logo

Costs + ADR = CADR

23 July 2015 / Hannah Rawlins
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs , ADR
printer mail-detail

Hannah Rawlins introduces CADR—a welcome alternative to detailed assessment

Changes to the CPR and rising court fees have resulted in a growing need for alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Aside from the general expense and CPR challenges it is a common frustration that significant delays are experienced in engaging in the formal detailed assessment process. In that period paying parties are left with the uncertainty of not knowing what their actual exposure will be and receiving parties are left out of pocket. Meanwhile interest continues to accrue on outstanding costs in the absence of exactly judged payments on account. No surprise then that ADR has become a sophisticated offering in both the domestic and international legal markets and is now being replicated in the litigious costs industry.

CADR

CADR (Costs Alternative Dispute Resolution) has formed an alternative dispute resolution panel bringing together a number of costs luminaries and experts at every level. Panel members include two recently retired members of the costs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll