header-logo header-logo

23 July 2015 / Hannah Rawlins
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs , ADR
printer mail-detail

Costs + ADR = CADR

Hannah Rawlins introduces CADR—a welcome alternative to detailed assessment

Changes to the CPR and rising court fees have resulted in a growing need for alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Aside from the general expense and CPR challenges it is a common frustration that significant delays are experienced in engaging in the formal detailed assessment process. In that period paying parties are left with the uncertainty of not knowing what their actual exposure will be and receiving parties are left out of pocket. Meanwhile interest continues to accrue on outstanding costs in the absence of exactly judged payments on account. No surprise then that ADR has become a sophisticated offering in both the domestic and international legal markets and is now being replicated in the litigious costs industry.

CADR

CADR (Costs Alternative Dispute Resolution) has formed an alternative dispute resolution panel bringing together a number of costs luminaries and experts at every level. Panel members include two recently retired members of the costs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll