header-logo header-logo

28 June 2023
Issue: 8031 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs budgeting clarity

Fees for attending meetings with case managers cannot be included in a costs budget, the High Court has held

In Hadley v Przybylo [2023] EWHC 1392 (KB), a complex personal injury case, Master Victoria McCloud gave a ruling on a principle of costs budgeting under the Civil Procedure Rules. She held the costs budget cannot include charges for solicitor attendance at case management meetings with medical professionals or financial and court of protection deputies, as these do not progress the court case.

The claimant contended attendance at the meetings progressed the case as they helped maintain the schedule of loss, and were usually included in the costs. The defendant argued they were no more progressive than having lawyers attend every medical treatment appointment, and were often rejected from the costs.

Master McCloud said: ‘In my judgment having a fee earner attending rehabilitation case management meetings is not progressive… and does not fall within the notion of “costs”.’

Issue: 8031 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll