header-logo header-logo

28 June 2023
Issue: 8031 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs budgeting clarity

Fees for attending meetings with case managers cannot be included in a costs budget, the High Court has held

In Hadley v Przybylo [2023] EWHC 1392 (KB), a complex personal injury case, Master Victoria McCloud gave a ruling on a principle of costs budgeting under the Civil Procedure Rules. She held the costs budget cannot include charges for solicitor attendance at case management meetings with medical professionals or financial and court of protection deputies, as these do not progress the court case.

The claimant contended attendance at the meetings progressed the case as they helped maintain the schedule of loss, and were usually included in the costs. The defendant argued they were no more progressive than having lawyers attend every medical treatment appointment, and were often rejected from the costs.

Master McCloud said: ‘In my judgment having a fee earner attending rehabilitation case management meetings is not progressive… and does not fall within the notion of “costs”.’

Issue: 8031 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll