header-logo header-logo

Costs budgeting: Teaching old dogs new tricks (Pt 1)

27 March 2013 / HH Judge Simon Brown KC
Categories: Features , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

HHJ Simon Brown’s exclusive online guide to costs budgeting

CPR 3.12 to 18 and PD.3E are the key to case management under the new post-Jackson regime. Quite simply, all competent civil litigation practitioners, old and new, must learn how to budget and manage their costs within agreed budgets, or budgets approved by the judge. Judges must learn how to approve and manage budgets that are “proportionate” to what is at stake. Well that all sounds simple but how?

First...what is a “Budget”?
The CPR glossary describes it as an: “An estimate of the reasonable and proportionate costs (including disbursements) which a party intends to incur in the proceedings.” This mirrors the definition of Standard (cp Indemnity) costs in CPR 44.3.

Second...learn the 12 Rules (like the old 12x table!)

  1. Budgets must be filed by the date specified in the notice served under rule 26.3(1), or, if no such date is specified, seven days before
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll