header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs capping orders

Costs

Proposals allowing the Court of Appeal to make costs capping orders have been outlined in a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation paper.

Willis v Nicolson [2007] All ER (D) 205 (Mar) considered whether it should provide guidance on costs capping. It found that it was for the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) to decide whether, and with what urgency, it should take up any issues identified.

The CPRC found that the court did have jurisdiction but that it should approach the orders “conservatively” and should only be made in exceptional circumstances.

The committee has produced draft rules amending the Civil Procedure Rules 1998. The full consultation can be found on the MoJ web site. The deadline for responses is 24 October 2008.

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll