Costs capping orders

Costs

Proposals allowing the Court of Appeal to make costs capping orders have been outlined in a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation paper.

Willis v Nicolson [2007] All ER (D) 205 (Mar) considered whether it should provide guidance on costs capping. It found that it was for the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) to decide whether, and with what urgency, it should take up any issues identified.

The CPRC found that the court did have jurisdiction but that it should approach the orders “conservatively” and should only be made in exceptional circumstances.

The committee has produced draft rules amending the Civil Procedure Rules 1998. The full consultation can be found on the MoJ web site. The deadline for responses is 24 October 2008.

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Costs

Costs capping orders

Costs

Proposals allowing the Court of Appeal to make costs capping orders have been outlined in a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation paper.

The CPRC found that the court did have jurisdiction but that it should approach the orders “conservatively” and should only be made in exceptional circumstances.

The committee has produced draft rules amending the Civil Procedure Rules 1998. The full consultation can be found on the MoJ web site. The deadline for responses is 24 October 2008.

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Costs

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Sanctions ruling casts ‘wide net’ over global finance

A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods

NLJ this week: England’s courts cement status as fraud battleground

Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide

NLJ this week: Mazur ruling puts firms on supervision alert

Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’

NLJ this week: Landlords’ forced entry powers spark legal divide

Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers

NLJ this week: Push to scrap ‘vague’ public office misconduct law

A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence

Error message

Costs capping orders

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association