header-logo header-logo

Costs capping orders

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs

Proposals allowing the Court of Appeal to make costs capping orders have been outlined in a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation paper.

Willis v Nicolson [2007] All ER (D) 205 (Mar) considered whether it should provide guidance on costs capping. It found that it was for the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) to decide whether, and with what urgency, it should take up any issues identified.

The CPRC found that the court did have jurisdiction but that it should approach the orders “conservatively” and should only be made in exceptional circumstances.

The committee has produced draft rules amending the Civil Procedure Rules 1998. The full consultation can be found on the MoJ web site. The deadline for responses is 24 October 2008.

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll