Costs capping orders

Costs

Proposals allowing the Court of Appeal to make costs capping orders have been outlined in a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation paper.

Willis v Nicolson [2007] All ER (D) 205 (Mar) considered whether it should provide guidance on costs capping. It found that it was for the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) to decide whether, and with what urgency, it should take up any issues identified.

The CPRC found that the court did have jurisdiction but that it should approach the orders “conservatively” and should only be made in exceptional circumstances.

The committee has produced draft rules amending the Civil Procedure Rules 1998. The full consultation can be found on the MoJ web site. The deadline for responses is 24 October 2008.

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Costs

Costs capping orders

Costs

Proposals allowing the Court of Appeal to make costs capping orders have been outlined in a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation paper.

The CPRC found that the court did have jurisdiction but that it should approach the orders “conservatively” and should only be made in exceptional circumstances.

The committee has produced draft rules amending the Civil Procedure Rules 1998. The full consultation can be found on the MoJ web site. The deadline for responses is 24 October 2008.

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Costs

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation

NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’

Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies

NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins

Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid

NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements

The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation

Error message

Costs capping orders

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree