header-logo header-logo

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Costs—Conditional fee agreement—Adjudication

Redwing Construction Ltd v Wishart [2011] EWHC 19 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 101 (Jan)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court (TCC), Akenhead J, 17 Jan 2011

The Technology and Construction Court has considered the use of conditional fee arrangements (CFA) and after the event insurance (ATE) in adjudication enforcement cases.

Samuel Townend (instructed by CJ Hough & Co) for the claimant. Camille Slow (instructed by Quercus Law) for the defendant.

Following an adjudication on 4 November 2009, the claimant issued proceedings for recovery of the award. The claimant entered into a CFA with its solicitors. The success fee was 100% of the solicitors’ basic charges. Notification of the CFA was not given to the defendant until 19 November. On 16 November, the claimant entered into an ATE insurance policy. The claimant was successful in recovering the award and it was common ground that the claimant was entitled to its cost on a standard basis. Before the court, however, an issue arose as to whether the claimant was entitled to the costs of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll