header-logo header-logo

The costs conundrum

23 March 2012 / William Gibson
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
istock_000018849510medium_4

In the first article in a special NLJ costs series, William Gibson reports on “safe” retainers & firefighting

Solicitors providing services under a retainer are subject to the provisions of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 and, pursuant to s 15, are entitled to reasonable remuneration for their services. What is reasonable, however, can depend on viewpoint. He who pays the piper can always object to the tune being played. An inaccurate or incomplete retainer arrangement can seriously damage your wealth.

In Minkin v Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor [2011] EWHC 177 QB, [2011] All ER (D) 82 (Feb) solicitors had persistently exceeded costs estimates, given originally with the retainer, without prior warning and were held to have breached the contract of retainer, rendering it unenforceable. When challenged by the clients their costs were disallowed in their entirety. Cranston J said that the firm: “Should have been clearer in its retainer letter as to the nature of the engagement…It should also

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll