header-logo header-logo

23 March 2012 / William Gibson
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

The costs conundrum

istock_000018849510medium_4

In the first article in a special NLJ costs series, William Gibson reports on “safe” retainers & firefighting

Solicitors providing services under a retainer are subject to the provisions of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 and, pursuant to s 15, are entitled to reasonable remuneration for their services. What is reasonable, however, can depend on viewpoint. He who pays the piper can always object to the tune being played. An inaccurate or incomplete retainer arrangement can seriously damage your wealth.

In Minkin v Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor [2011] EWHC 177 QB, [2011] All ER (D) 82 (Feb) solicitors had persistently exceeded costs estimates, given originally with the retainer, without prior warning and were held to have breached the contract of retainer, rendering it unenforceable. When challenged by the clients their costs were disallowed in their entirety. Cranston J said that the firm: “Should have been clearer in its retainer letter as to the nature of the engagement…It should also

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll