header-logo header-logo

02 December 2011 / Michael Cook
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

The costs of going solo

Michael Cook examines the financial implications of litigants in person

By definition you will never act for a litigant in person (LIP); but however much you may wish to ignore them, “Lippies”, as they are affectionately known, are not going to go away. Their rates have been increased, legal aid is to dwindle yet again, so they will proliferate.

Successive governments cannot be accused of offering financial inducements to litigants to do it themselves. As Sir Rupert Jackson observed in Chapter 14 of the final report of his Review of Civil Litigation Costs, the hourly rate allowed to successful litigants in person had not been increased from £9.25 per hour since 1 December 1995. Applying the average earnings index for private sector services, the figure in December 2009 would have risen to £15.32, while annual increases of £1 had resulted in the equivalent figure awarded in employment tribunals being £29. He recommended a prescribed rate of £20 an hour. The 57th Update

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll