header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007 / Prof A Mcgee , P Hughes , Dr Friston , M Smith
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Costs law brief

Ordinary claims, Defamation claims, Group litigation, Public interest challenges

Costs capping

In Willis v Nicolson [2007] EWCA Civ 199, the Court of Appeal (assisted by the senior costs judge as assessor) dealt with an appeal in respect of an application for a costs cap in a personal injury claim.  The claimant was a motorcyclist who had suffered extremely serious injuries in a road traffic accident.  On a full liability basis, the value of the claim is likely to be at least £5 million; the total costs for the whole action were estimated by the claimant’s solicitors at £959,342.

Field J refused the defendant’s application for a costs cap, but in order to provide her with a measure of protection, he ordered that the claimant be held to his latest estimate.

The Court of Appeal (Buxton, Smith and Wilson LLJs) dismissed the appeal for the primary reasons that it was now too late to impose a costs cap and also because of the further costs that would be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll