header-logo header-logo

Costs lawyers report back from the pandemic

15 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Costs , Profession
printer mail-detail
Costs lawyers have weathered the COVID-19 crisis well, with more than a third reporting they are busier than ever

Responding to the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) annual survey. 37% of costs lawyers said they were busier than before the pandemic and a further 38% said the crisis had not made much difference to their practice.

However, 15% said their workload had reduced, one respondent had lost their job and three of the lawyers said they were having to consider making redundancies.

The survey was completed by 126 lawyers or about one fifth of the profession.

Nearly half the costs lawyers have not found it easy to conduct hearings online, although four out of ten noted how opposing parties have cooperated well to make remote hearings work.

More than one in five worked from home prior to the pandemic, and a further 29% said working from home has become a permanent choice for them. However, nearly one in five reported problems supervising colleagues at home.

One in six respondents said solicitors are paying their bills more slowly

ACL chair Claire Green said: ‘The vital role of costs lawyers in ensuring that solicitors are properly paid for the work they do has come to the fore during the pandemic―there has never been a more important time for firms to realise the value of their efforts.

‘Covid has, of course, been difficult for everyone but it has had the positive side effect of encouraging greater digitisation, whether in time recording and preparing bundles for hearings, as well as embedding the electronic bill yet further. The Senior Costs Judge has made clear that he expects remote hearings to remain part of the Senior Courts Costs Office’s work even after life returns to normal, especially for short hearings.

‘What costs lawyers have proven over recent months is that they are adaptable, increasingly tech-savvy and able to step up when their clients need them.’

Categories: Legal News , Costs , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Tim Foley

Winckworth Sherwood—Tim Foley

Property litigation practice strengthened by partner hire

Kingsley Napley—Romilly Holland

Kingsley Napley—Romilly Holland

International arbitration team specialist joins the team

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll