header-logo header-logo

Costs—Payment of costs by non-party—Solicitor

12 October 2012
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tinseltime Ltd v Roberts and others [2012] EWHC 2628 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 19 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court (Manchester District Registry), Judge Stephen Davies sitting as a Judge of the High Court, 28 Sep 2012

The High Court has considered principles under which a solicitor may be liable as a non-party funder of proceedings under s 51(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981) and/or CPR 48.

Richard Coplin (instructed by GHP Legal) for the defendants. Simon Wilton (instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP) for the solicitor.

The claimant company commenced proceedings against the defendants for negligence and nuisance (the substantive proceedings). It instructed the respondent solicitor under a conditional fee agreement (CFA). The solicitor advised the claimant’s sole director and shareholder (the director) about after the event insurance (ATE) but the director was not interested due to the company’s difficult financial position. Following a preliminary issue ([2011] All ER (D) 76 (Jun)) the court ordered the claims against the first and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll