header-logo header-logo

Costs—Referral fees

15 March 2013
Issue: 7552 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Association of Personal Injury Lawyers) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] All ER (D) 11 (Mar)

Under the provisions of ss 56-60 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, the payment and receipt of referral fees in personal injury cases would be banned from April 2013 as part of the government’s reform on “no win no fee” conditional fee agreements. One of the effects of the provisions of the Act was to reduce the fixed costs for small value personal injuries claims. The reforms had been made clear in advance to relevant groups, however there had still been some discussions concerning the amount of the reduction to fixed costs. In February 2012, the prime minister met with representatives from the insurance industry, following which, communications were sent between the government and the insurance industry. Subsequently, the provisions and effects of the Act were made public. The claimant challenged, by way of judicial review, the secretary of state’s decision to implement the reforms. The claimant submitted that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll