header-logo header-logo

Costs—Referral fees

15 March 2013
Issue: 7552 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Association of Personal Injury Lawyers) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] All ER (D) 11 (Mar)

Under the provisions of ss 56-60 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, the payment and receipt of referral fees in personal injury cases would be banned from April 2013 as part of the government’s reform on “no win no fee” conditional fee agreements. One of the effects of the provisions of the Act was to reduce the fixed costs for small value personal injuries claims. The reforms had been made clear in advance to relevant groups, however there had still been some discussions concerning the amount of the reduction to fixed costs. In February 2012, the prime minister met with representatives from the insurance industry, following which, communications were sent between the government and the insurance industry. Subsequently, the provisions and effects of the Act were made public. The claimant challenged, by way of judicial review, the secretary of state’s decision to implement the reforms. The claimant submitted that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll