header-logo header-logo

01 June 2015
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Could bridge be a sport?

Duplicate bridge could be argued to be a sport, the High Court has held.

In R (on behalf of English Bridge Union) v Sport England [2015] EWHC 1347 (Admin), Mr Justice Mostyn granted permission for the Union to bring a judicial review against Sport England’s refusal to recognise duplicate bridge as a sport.

Duplicate bridge is the most common variation of bridge in club and tournament play, and is called “duplicate” because the same arrangement of cards, or deal, is played at each table and scoring is based on relative performance.

Mostyn J said it was “significant” that in 1999, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) acknowledged that bridge and chess should be considered sports. The IOC recognised these as “mind sports” which should be separately categorised and excluded from participation in the Olympic programme but still recognised them as sports. Mostyn J noted that tug of war was in the Olympics in 1905 but is no longer included in the programme.

He concluded: “I do recognise, just as [Mr Justice] Haddon Cave did, that there are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll