header-logo header-logo

Could do better

09 April 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail
nlj_april_17_robins

Jon Robins takes issue with the corporate aspect of the largely well-intentioned Manifesto for Justice

“Justice is not like any other public service,” begins a “Manifesto for Justice” published last month with a cover depicting Lady Justice in a style apparently inspired by Soviet-era propaganda posters. It is a short pamphlet written by a coalition of groups comprising the Bar Council, the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, the Law Centres Network, AdviceUK and the Legal Action Group. 

Unlike other public services, there are few votes in “justice”. The great British public care deeply about the issues that impact upon doctors and teachers and the ability to do their jobs; but, to risk a generalisation, they couldn't give a monkey’s about lawyers and legal aid. So, inevitably, the parlous state of our legal system as it relates to ordinary people is a non-issue as 7 May approaches. 

Selective view

So the manifesto is a well-meant attempt to rouse some enthusiasm to debate important issues that are largely ignored. It’s a modest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll