header-logo header-logo

09 April 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Could do better

nlj_april_17_robins

Jon Robins takes issue with the corporate aspect of the largely well-intentioned Manifesto for Justice

“Justice is not like any other public service,” begins a “Manifesto for Justice” published last month with a cover depicting Lady Justice in a style apparently inspired by Soviet-era propaganda posters. It is a short pamphlet written by a coalition of groups comprising the Bar Council, the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, the Law Centres Network, AdviceUK and the Legal Action Group. 

Unlike other public services, there are few votes in “justice”. The great British public care deeply about the issues that impact upon doctors and teachers and the ability to do their jobs; but, to risk a generalisation, they couldn't give a monkey’s about lawyers and legal aid. So, inevitably, the parlous state of our legal system as it relates to ordinary people is a non-issue as 7 May approaches. 

Selective view

So the manifesto is a well-meant attempt to rouse some enthusiasm to debate important issues that are largely ignored. It’s a modest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll