header-logo header-logo

Could post-Brexit UK-Ireland extradition arrangements be unlawful?

24 September 2021 / George Hepburne Scott
Issue: 7949 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Extradition
printer mail-detail
58612
George Hepburne-Scott considers the potential impact of Saqlain’s referral to the European Court of Justice
  • Are post-Brexit extradition arrangements between the UK and Ireland on the brink of being declared unlawful by the EU’s top court?
  • Looks at the case of Saqlain v Governor of Cloverhill Prison and Salman v Governor of Mountjoy Prison.

Following the seismic shift in the relationship between the UK and the EU post 11 pm on 31 December 2020 (Brexit day), the extradition arrangements between the two also fundamentally altered. Or did they?

Polakowski

It could be argued that in reality very little changed. There was a perhaps predictable, immediate challenge in the High Court of England and Wales: the case of Polakowski & Ors v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2021] EWHC 53 (Admin), [2021] All ER (D) 70 (Jan) in effect challenged the legality of the UK’s post-Brexit extradition arrangements with the EU.

However, these challenges were roundly rejected by the High Court in that case which robustly described them as ‘misconceived’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll