header-logo header-logo

Counting the cost

10 June 2010 / Richard East
Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

If the controversial recommendations in Lord Jackson's recent report are adopted then lawyers in England and Wales will for the first time be able to take a slice of their client's damages.

What place might contingency fees have in large-scale commercial cases and what are the associated problems for such fee models? asks Richard East

If the controversial recommendations in Lord Jackson's recent report are adopted then lawyers in England and Wales will for the first time be able to take a slice of their client's damages.

My own view is that it will take some time for the market to adjust but such contingencies fees have the potential to change the shape of major commercial litigation.

A firm's own financial success becomes tied not to the volume or intensity of its cases but to their outcome and, more specifically, to the ultimate recovery. There is an attractive logic in achieving such a close alignment between the interests of the client and those of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll