header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Penny Booth
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Counting the cost

Penny Booth asks who pays for the children in same sex relationships?

A case heard in the Leeds High Court last month, (as yet unreported) highlights again the issue of who pays for children when relationships end, and the more general question of what we understand by “parent”. It is the possible ramifications which are of interest to practitioners. The future may well bring more such cases to the high street practitioner who will have to advise on this and related issues in same sex relationships (particularly those with children) in the future.

The basic information on this case is that a former same sex couple who began their relationship in 1994 and lived together until 2007 (but did not enter into a formal relationship and therefore had no civil partnership) were attempting to resolve issues of maintenance in respect of a child for whom both appeared to have had caring responsibilities. The child was born as a result of treatment using an authorised clinic and anonymous donor sperm after they both applied for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft further builds national Professional Liability practice, hiring two partners in Bristol

NEWS
A child’s views can be taken into account during international child abduction proceedings, the Supreme Court has held
Small and medium-sized law firms have urged regulators to pause plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
Lawyers have raised the alarm on employment tribunal delays and backlogs, with some cases facing a three-year wait for a hearing
The controversial assisted dying Bill has drawn to a halt after MPs defeated it by 286 votes to 270
MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)
back-to-top-scroll