header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Penny Booth
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Counting the cost

Penny Booth asks who pays for the children in same sex relationships?

A case heard in the Leeds High Court last month, (as yet unreported) highlights again the issue of who pays for children when relationships end, and the more general question of what we understand by “parent”. It is the possible ramifications which are of interest to practitioners. The future may well bring more such cases to the high street practitioner who will have to advise on this and related issues in same sex relationships (particularly those with children) in the future.

The basic information on this case is that a former same sex couple who began their relationship in 1994 and lived together until 2007 (but did not enter into a formal relationship and therefore had no civil partnership) were attempting to resolve issues of maintenance in respect of a child for whom both appeared to have had caring responsibilities. The child was born as a result of treatment using an authorised clinic and anonymous donor sperm after they both applied for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll