header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Penny Booth
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Counting the cost

Penny Booth asks who pays for the children in same sex relationships?

A case heard in the Leeds High Court last month, (as yet unreported) highlights again the issue of who pays for children when relationships end, and the more general question of what we understand by “parent”. It is the possible ramifications which are of interest to practitioners. The future may well bring more such cases to the high street practitioner who will have to advise on this and related issues in same sex relationships (particularly those with children) in the future.

The basic information on this case is that a former same sex couple who began their relationship in 1994 and lived together until 2007 (but did not enter into a formal relationship and therefore had no civil partnership) were attempting to resolve issues of maintenance in respect of a child for whom both appeared to have had caring responsibilities. The child was born as a result of treatment using an authorised clinic and anonymous donor sperm after they both applied for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll