header-logo header-logo

Couples' agreements: Settlement matters (Pt 2)

13 October 2023 / David Burrows
Issue: 8044 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
142611
In a second update on financial settlements, David Burrows focuses on couples’ agreements & issues a plea for change
  • How are agreements between couples, married or unmarried, dealt with?
  • Admissions against interest & the without prejudice rule.
  • Procedure: constructing an agreement or a court order recording terms.

In ‘Settlement matters’ it was explained that a married or civil partnership couple could claim to be victims of the dilatoriness of rule-makers. For 55 years rule-makers have had statutory powers to enable such couples to ask the family courts to uphold any agreement between them many weeks prior to any finalisation of their dissolution application.

The contrast for the position of the cohabitant couple who are unmarried or not in a civil partnership is clear. Unmarried couples are treated, in a sense, as adults who can reach their own agreement which the civil (ie not family) courts will uphold in contract or equity terms, and in a way which is not always the case with family courts judges. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll