header-logo header-logo

Couples' agreements: Settlement matters (Pt 2)

13 October 2023 / David Burrows
Issue: 8044 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
142611
In a second update on financial settlements, David Burrows focuses on couples’ agreements & issues a plea for change
  • How are agreements between couples, married or unmarried, dealt with?
  • Admissions against interest & the without prejudice rule.
  • Procedure: constructing an agreement or a court order recording terms.

In ‘Settlement matters’ it was explained that a married or civil partnership couple could claim to be victims of the dilatoriness of rule-makers. For 55 years rule-makers have had statutory powers to enable such couples to ask the family courts to uphold any agreement between them many weeks prior to any finalisation of their dissolution application.

The contrast for the position of the cohabitant couple who are unmarried or not in a civil partnership is clear. Unmarried couples are treated, in a sense, as adults who can reach their own agreement which the civil (ie not family) courts will uphold in contract or equity terms, and in a way which is not always the case with family courts judges. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll