header-logo header-logo

Couples' agreements: Settlement matters (Pt 2)

13 October 2023 / David Burrows
Issue: 8044 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
142611
In a second update on financial settlements, David Burrows focuses on couples’ agreements & issues a plea for change
  • How are agreements between couples, married or unmarried, dealt with?
  • Admissions against interest & the without prejudice rule.
  • Procedure: constructing an agreement or a court order recording terms.

In ‘Settlement matters’ it was explained that a married or civil partnership couple could claim to be victims of the dilatoriness of rule-makers. For 55 years rule-makers have had statutory powers to enable such couples to ask the family courts to uphold any agreement between them many weeks prior to any finalisation of their dissolution application.

The contrast for the position of the cohabitant couple who are unmarried or not in a civil partnership is clear. Unmarried couples are treated, in a sense, as adults who can reach their own agreement which the civil (ie not family) courts will uphold in contract or equity terms, and in a way which is not always the case with family courts judges. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll