header-logo header-logo

Couples' agreements: Settlement matters (Pt 2)

13 October 2023 / David Burrows
Issue: 8044 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
142611
In a second update on financial settlements, David Burrows focuses on couples’ agreements & issues a plea for change
  • How are agreements between couples, married or unmarried, dealt with?
  • Admissions against interest & the without prejudice rule.
  • Procedure: constructing an agreement or a court order recording terms.

In ‘Settlement matters’ it was explained that a married or civil partnership couple could claim to be victims of the dilatoriness of rule-makers. For 55 years rule-makers have had statutory powers to enable such couples to ask the family courts to uphold any agreement between them many weeks prior to any finalisation of their dissolution application.

The contrast for the position of the cohabitant couple who are unmarried or not in a civil partnership is clear. Unmarried couples are treated, in a sense, as adults who can reach their own agreement which the civil (ie not family) courts will uphold in contract or equity terms, and in a way which is not always the case with family courts judges. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll