header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 April 2012 / Jennifer James
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Court in the act

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jennifer James tackles courtroom controversy

According to Daniel Martin, writing in the Daily Mail on Monday 23 April 2012, taxpayers could be left with a £300,000 bill for a contempt of court case against former cabinet minister Peter Hain. In his memoirs, Hain attacked Paul Girvan LJ for his handling of a legal challenge to his (Hain’s) appointment of Bertha McDougall. McDougall, since awarded an OBE, is listed as interim commissioner for victims and survivors of the troubles, a post in which she might be expected to have exceptional insight, as her husband Lindsay was killed by the Irish National Liberation Army back in 1981 while serving as a reservist with the Royal Ulster Constabulary.

Scandalising the court

The former Northern Ireland secretary is evidently being prosecuted for “unwarranted abuse of a judge” under the rarely used 18th century offence of “scandalising the court”, this being centred upon a passage in Hain’s memoirs in which he is critical of how Girvan LJ handled this matter.

David Davis, the former shadow home secretary who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll