header-logo header-logo

26 April 2012 / Jennifer James
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Court in the act

Jennifer James tackles courtroom controversy

According to Daniel Martin, writing in the Daily Mail on Monday 23 April 2012, taxpayers could be left with a £300,000 bill for a contempt of court case against former cabinet minister Peter Hain. In his memoirs, Hain attacked Paul Girvan LJ for his handling of a legal challenge to his (Hain’s) appointment of Bertha McDougall. McDougall, since awarded an OBE, is listed as interim commissioner for victims and survivors of the troubles, a post in which she might be expected to have exceptional insight, as her husband Lindsay was killed by the Irish National Liberation Army back in 1981 while serving as a reservist with the Royal Ulster Constabulary.

Scandalising the court

The former Northern Ireland secretary is evidently being prosecuted for “unwarranted abuse of a judge” under the rarely used 18th century offence of “scandalising the court”, this being centred upon a passage in Hain’s memoirs in which he is critical of how Girvan LJ handled this matter.

David Davis, the former shadow home secretary who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll