header-logo header-logo

13 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Court advice on COVID-19

Business continues in courts and tribunals―but not quite as normal―during the COVID-19 outbreak, HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS) has confirmed

In guidance issued this week, HMCTS states: ‘Any changes to individual hearings will be communicated directly to those affected in the usual way, usually by email and/or phone.’

All court and tribunal users, including witnesses and jurors, should read the latest information about prevention, treatment and travel. HMCTS reiterates government advice that individuals stay at home for seven days if they have either ‘a high temperature’ or ‘a new continuous cough’, and do not go to a GP surgery, pharmacy or hospital.

Where COVID-19 infection is suspected or confirmed, they should contact the relevant court or tribunal.

As NLJ reported this week, judges have been taking a pragmatic approach to adjournment of cases, in response to the virus. For example, London Central employment tribunal postponed a whistleblowing and unfair dismissal case last week after being informed a Simons Muirhead & Burton client had displayed symptoms. The judge did not ask for medical evidence to be produced, as would normally be the case, and allowed the case to be postponed on lesser evidence.

Hygiene in the court and tribunal buildings has been stepped up, following complaints of a lack of soap at washing facilities, and security policy has been changed to allow people to bring in their own hand sanitisers.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll