header-logo header-logo

Court allows injunction sent via Twitter

20 November 2014
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A law firm has been given permission to serve an injunction on a defendant via twitter, in what may be a legal first.

A client of SGH Martineau’s education team had ejected an undesirable far-right group from one of its campuses and sought an injunction against them trespassing on the university’s land again. However, they faced the problem of how to serve the papers since the group was not a recognised political group with offices or an organised infrastructure and mainly used social media to organise their activities. Therefore, they asked if they could use Twitter.

James Fownes, property disputes solicitor at SGH Martineau, says: “Interestingly the judge demonstrated a real understanding of the problems of the digital, virtual world. He not only granted our request to serve papers via Twitter, but granted a further injunction against one of the defendants which compelled him to procure that the group’s (offshore) web hosting company posted the original injunction on the group’s website. This interesting twist ensured we actually served two different injunctions”

Issue: 7631 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll