header-logo header-logo

02 August 2023
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Media
printer mail-detail

Court on camera: filming in court now ‘the norm’

Some 33 serious criminal cases have been filmed and broadcast since camera crews were first allowed into the crown courts one year ago.

Only the judge’s sentencing remarks can be filmed, so as to protect the privacy of victims, witnesses and jurors. Live broadcasts are aired with a short delay to account for reporting restrictions.

Parliament is now consulting on whether to expand filming to include Court of Appeal judges sitting in the crown court. The Ministry of Justice consultation, ‘Open justice: the way forward’, is open until 7 September.

Justice minister Mike Freer said the broadcasts ‘allowed the public to see justice being done in their courts and to understand the complex decisions judges make, building confidence in the justice system’.

John Battle, ITN’s head of legal, said filming ‘has swiftly become the norm’.

Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll