header-logo header-logo

10 July 2014
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Court orders woman to have caesarean

A woman with learning difficulties, autism and “an extraordinary obstetric history” lacks capacity to make decisions about her healthcare and must have a caesarean, the Court of Protection has ruled.

The Mental Health and the Acute Trust v DD & Anor [2014] EWCOP 11 concerned DD, who is expecting her sixth child. Her previous children were taken into care after various alarming incidents. DD also hid her later pregnancies from social workers, refused entry to her home, and declined to attend doctor’s appointments. She had home births in secret, which caused her health complications, including haemorrhage and blood clots. One child was born very prematurely. Another child was discovered in a sickly, undernourished state. She did not maintain contact with her first child, who was adopted by a grandparent. DD was also assessed as having delusional beliefs.

Mr Justice Cobb held that it was in DD’s best interests for her to be conveyed to hospital against her wishes and for a planned caesarean section to be carried out. He authorised the health trust “to take such necessary, reasonable and proportionate measures to give effect to the best interests declaration above to include forced entry into her home, restraint (so that she does not leave the ward pending treatment and/or until it is clinically appropriate for her to be discharged) and sedation”.

He added that he required the trust “to take all reasonable steps to minimise distress to DD and to maintain her dignity”.

Cobb J declined an application to assess DD’s capacity to make decisions about contraception but advised that this be decided “as a matter of urgency and priority” once DD had given birth.

Issue: 7614 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll