header-logo header-logo

Court orders woman to have caesarean

10 July 2014
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A woman with learning difficulties, autism and “an extraordinary obstetric history” lacks capacity to make decisions about her healthcare and must have a caesarean, the Court of Protection has ruled.

The Mental Health and the Acute Trust v DD & Anor [2014] EWCOP 11 concerned DD, who is expecting her sixth child. Her previous children were taken into care after various alarming incidents. DD also hid her later pregnancies from social workers, refused entry to her home, and declined to attend doctor’s appointments. She had home births in secret, which caused her health complications, including haemorrhage and blood clots. One child was born very prematurely. Another child was discovered in a sickly, undernourished state. She did not maintain contact with her first child, who was adopted by a grandparent. DD was also assessed as having delusional beliefs.

Mr Justice Cobb held that it was in DD’s best interests for her to be conveyed to hospital against her wishes and for a planned caesarean section to be carried out. He authorised the health trust “to take such necessary, reasonable and proportionate measures to give effect to the best interests declaration above to include forced entry into her home, restraint (so that she does not leave the ward pending treatment and/or until it is clinically appropriate for her to be discharged) and sedation”.

He added that he required the trust “to take all reasonable steps to minimise distress to DD and to maintain her dignity”.

Cobb J declined an application to assess DD’s capacity to make decisions about contraception but advised that this be decided “as a matter of urgency and priority” once DD had given birth.

Issue: 7614 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll