header-logo header-logo

Court orders woman to have caesarean

10 July 2014
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A woman with learning difficulties, autism and “an extraordinary obstetric history” lacks capacity to make decisions about her healthcare and must have a caesarean, the Court of Protection has ruled.

The Mental Health and the Acute Trust v DD & Anor [2014] EWCOP 11 concerned DD, who is expecting her sixth child. Her previous children were taken into care after various alarming incidents. DD also hid her later pregnancies from social workers, refused entry to her home, and declined to attend doctor’s appointments. She had home births in secret, which caused her health complications, including haemorrhage and blood clots. One child was born very prematurely. Another child was discovered in a sickly, undernourished state. She did not maintain contact with her first child, who was adopted by a grandparent. DD was also assessed as having delusional beliefs.

Mr Justice Cobb held that it was in DD’s best interests for her to be conveyed to hospital against her wishes and for a planned caesarean section to be carried out. He authorised the health trust “to take such necessary, reasonable and proportionate measures to give effect to the best interests declaration above to include forced entry into her home, restraint (so that she does not leave the ward pending treatment and/or until it is clinically appropriate for her to be discharged) and sedation”.

He added that he required the trust “to take all reasonable steps to minimise distress to DD and to maintain her dignity”.

Cobb J declined an application to assess DD’s capacity to make decisions about contraception but advised that this be decided “as a matter of urgency and priority” once DD had given birth.

Issue: 7614 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll