header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 November 2012
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Court of Protection—Practice—Costs

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

NHS Trust v D (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) [2012] EWHC 886 (COP), [2012] All ER (D) 171 (Apr)

Court of Protection, Peter Jackson J, 17 April 2012

The Court of Protection Rules 2007 have not affected the long-standing practice of the court exercising its discretion to make orders requiring NHS trusts to pay half the costs of the Official Solicitor in proceedings regarding the withdrawal of medical treatment.

Victoria Butler-Cole for the trust. Christopher Johnston QC for D.

D was a patient who had been in a permanent vegetative state since July 2011. The NHS trust who was treating him applied for declarations authorising the removal of medical treatment from him. The application was supported by all concerned with D’s welfare, and was allowed by the court (see [2012] EWHC 885 (COP)). The official solicitor, who had acted as D’s litigation friend at the court’s request, applied for an order that the trust should pay half of his costs. The application was opposed by the trust, who argued that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll