header-logo header-logo

16 November 2012
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Court of Protection—Practice—Costs

NHS Trust v D (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) [2012] EWHC 886 (COP), [2012] All ER (D) 171 (Apr)

Court of Protection, Peter Jackson J, 17 April 2012

The Court of Protection Rules 2007 have not affected the long-standing practice of the court exercising its discretion to make orders requiring NHS trusts to pay half the costs of the Official Solicitor in proceedings regarding the withdrawal of medical treatment.

Victoria Butler-Cole for the trust. Christopher Johnston QC for D.

D was a patient who had been in a permanent vegetative state since July 2011. The NHS trust who was treating him applied for declarations authorising the removal of medical treatment from him. The application was supported by all concerned with D’s welfare, and was allowed by the court (see [2012] EWHC 885 (COP)). The official solicitor, who had acted as D’s litigation friend at the court’s request, applied for an order that the trust should pay half of his costs. The application was opposed by the trust, who argued that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll