header-logo header-logo

05 July 2023
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

Court reform programme over budget & under-delivering

MPs have delivered a blistering verdict on the management of the issue-ridden court reform programme.

Publishing its ‘Progress on the courts and tribunals reform programme’ report last week, the Public Accounts Committee expressed serious concerns that HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has just £120m left of its total £1.3bn budget despite completing only 24 of 44 reform projects.

Following some timetable revisions, HMCTS now plans to deliver most reforms by March 2024. Its digital case-management system, Common Platform, is expected to complete in March 2025, more than a year behind schedule.

The committee highlighted numerous technical issues encountered during the roll-out of Common Platform, which created stress for court staff already coping with large backlogs of cases. It noted issues with some reformed services resulted in solicitors not receiving necessary notifications. Moreover, HMCTS had ‘not done enough to listen’ to court users’ concerns.

The committee’s chair, Dame Meg Hillier MP, said: ‘These are services crying out for critical reform, but frustratingly HMCTS’s attempts appear in some cases to be actively hindering its own staff’s ability to carry out their jobs.

‘HMCTS has now burnt through almost its entire budget for a programme of reform only a little over halfway complete.’

Nick Vineall KC, chair of the Bar Council, said the committee’s criticisms ‘echo the experiences we hear from barristers, especially in relation to Common Platform.

‘To date, the programme has not delivered on its promise of saving time and costs. In some cases, the introduction of Common Platform has slowed the system down, reducing court capacity.’

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Feedback from our members has been that the speed of change and the number of changes all at once has been problematic.

‘Rolling out unfinished or untested software drives delays and costs, as we have seen with Common Platform.’

Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll