header-logo header-logo

Court reform programme over budget & under-delivering

05 July 2023
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail
MPs have delivered a blistering verdict on the management of the issue-ridden court reform programme.

Publishing its ‘Progress on the courts and tribunals reform programme’ report last week, the Public Accounts Committee expressed serious concerns that HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has just £120m left of its total £1.3bn budget despite completing only 24 of 44 reform projects.

Following some timetable revisions, HMCTS now plans to deliver most reforms by March 2024. Its digital case-management system, Common Platform, is expected to complete in March 2025, more than a year behind schedule.

The committee highlighted numerous technical issues encountered during the roll-out of Common Platform, which created stress for court staff already coping with large backlogs of cases. It noted issues with some reformed services resulted in solicitors not receiving necessary notifications. Moreover, HMCTS had ‘not done enough to listen’ to court users’ concerns.

The committee’s chair, Dame Meg Hillier MP, said: ‘These are services crying out for critical reform, but frustratingly HMCTS’s attempts appear in some cases to be actively hindering its own staff’s ability to carry out their jobs.

‘HMCTS has now burnt through almost its entire budget for a programme of reform only a little over halfway complete.’

Nick Vineall KC, chair of the Bar Council, said the committee’s criticisms ‘echo the experiences we hear from barristers, especially in relation to Common Platform.

‘To date, the programme has not delivered on its promise of saving time and costs. In some cases, the introduction of Common Platform has slowed the system down, reducing court capacity.’

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Feedback from our members has been that the speed of change and the number of changes all at once has been problematic.

‘Rolling out unfinished or untested software drives delays and costs, as we have seen with Common Platform.’

Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

360 Law Group—Anthony Gahan

360 Law Group—Anthony Gahan

Investment banking veteran appointed as chairman to drive global growth

NEWS
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
back-to-top-scroll