header-logo header-logo

24 January 2013
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Court on YouTube

Supreme Court summing-ups to be posted on internet

The Supreme Court is to post videos on YouTube of the lead justice’s five-minute summing-up in each case.

The videos will be available to view from this week, and will be uploaded to a dedicated Supreme Court channel on YouTube by lunchtime on the same day they are delivered (www.youtube.com/uksupremecourt).

The first video will be of the high-profile Prudential case on legal professional privilege.

The lead justices have delivered the brief summaries in court since the Supreme Court opened in 2009. They aim to explain the background to the appeal, the decision the court has reached, and the reasons for that decision.

The Supreme Court already broadcasts its hearings live through the Sky News website.

Lord Neuberger, president of the Supreme Court, said: “Demand for our live web stream of proceedings has far outstripped our expectations.

“We hope this new service will open up another window on our work and the reasoning behind our decisions, and broaden our audience.”

James Wilson, managing editor of All England Law Reports, says: “There is no difference in principle between sitting in court watching a case and watching a broadcast over the internet, so it is to be hoped that coverage of court is extended.”

Issue: 7545 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll