header-logo header-logo

Courting controversy

25 September 2009 / Kristian Grice , Michael Fenn
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Michael Fenn & Kristian Grice on why more global disputes are heading for English courts

In the modern world of commercial globalisation, there are an increasing number of relationships between parties that span different legal jurisdictions. When things go wrong, a party may want the security of knowing that the English courts will decide the dispute. In particular, there has been a keen appetite on the part of Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs in recent years to battle out their disputes here, but how certain can any parties be that the English courts will decide their dispute? Two recent cases have provided further judicial guidance on this issue.

Is the English court the natural forum?

There must, of course, be some connection with this jurisdiction for it to be the natural forum in which a case should be tried, being the forum “with which the action ha[s] the most real and substantial connection” (The Abidin Daver [1984] 1 AC 398 (The Abidin Daver)).
Some factors to consider for this include, for example, whether at least

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll