header-logo header-logo

29 July 2013
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Courts will review £1,200 employee fees

Unison wins permission to challenge employment tribunal fees

The High Court has given Unison, the trade union, permission to bring a judicial review challenging the introduction of employment tribunal fees.

The hearing is due to take place in October. Unison succeeded at an oral hearing in the High Court this week, although its paper application failed. However, the court rejected its application for an injunction to prevent the fees coming into force.

As of this week, employees and ex-employees will need to pay £160–£250 to issue a claim, and a hearing fee of £230–£950. Groups issuing a claim will pay higher fees of £320–£1,500 to issue claims and £460–£5,700 for a hearing.

The lower range of fees will apply to simpler cases such as wages claims, while the higher fees will apply to unfair dismissal and discrimination cases.

Previously, claimants did not pay fees.

In its legal challenge, Unison will argue that:

  • the fees are prohibitively expensive, and the national courts have a duty under EU law not to make it excessively difficult to exercise individual rights;
  • fees are not payable in most tribunal claims therefore it breaches the principle of equivalence;
  • there has been no proper assessment of the public sector equality duty; and
  • the fees will have a disproportionate impact on women.

Remissions will be granted in certain circumstances. An unmarried claimant with no children will not qualify if they are earning over £13,000. A married person with four children will be ineligible if the combined household income exceeds £29,000.

Employment law barrister Elizabeth George, of Leigh Day & Co said employers “will be less inclined to abide by their legal obligations as the risk of being challenged will be much reduced”.

However, justice minister Helen Grant said it was important to reduce the financial burden of the £74m employment tribunal system.

Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Jean-François Le Gal

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Jean-François Le Gal

Penningtons Manches Cooper strengthens international disputes team with appointment of leading arbitration partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Aaron Sanders & Kate Saunders

Shakespeare Martineau—Aaron Sanders & Kate Saunders

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens trust and estates disputes team with new appointments

Bellevue Law—Shannon Moore

Bellevue Law—Shannon Moore

Bellevue Law strengthens employment disputes and international advisory capability with senior associate appointment

NEWS
More than 500 former rugby players can pursue brain injury claims despite serious failures to disclose documents ordered by the High Court
Developers in areas with poorly performing councils can apply directly to the Planning Inspectorate for permission under section 62A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
When does a solicitor’s retainer become a contentious business agreement? The Court of Appeal’s decision in Broadfield Law UK LLP v Barnes shows that listing hourly rates alone will not do, leaving firms and clients uncertain about their rights over bills
MPs cannot simply resign their Commons seats. Instead, they take a nominal Crown office, usually the Chiltern Hundreds or Manor of Northstead, which disqualifies them from sitting
The Thirlwall Inquiry has exposed a ‘complete failure’ to protect babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital, but its recommendations must now be put into practice
back-to-top-scroll