header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7571

02 August 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

David Greene reveals his holiday reading list

Jon Holbrook fears the emergence of a disturbing new tort of intolerance

John McMullen talks TUPE & service provision change

When is a clean break not a clean break? Margaret Hatwood & Rebecca Carter report

Does the Snatch Land Rover case place too many battlefield obligations on the MoD? Richard Scorer reports

Philip Sissons discusses the issue of recovering rent after the exercise of a break clause

Education providers require a lesson in data protection, says Tom Morrison

Fiscale eenheid PPG Holdings BV cs te Hoogezand v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Noord/kantoor Groningen C-26/12 [2013] All ER (D) 258 (Jul)

Great Elephant Corporation v Trafigura Beheer BV and other companies [2013] EWCA Civ 905, [2013] All ER (D) 315 (Jul)

R (on the application of Attfield) v London Borough of Barnet [2013] EWHC 2089 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 248 (Jul)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll